United States (1971), New York Times co-counsel Floyd Abrams and attorney Ted Olson talked about President Nixon's reaction to the New York Times' publication of the Pentagon Papers.

In discussing the landmark Supreme Court Case New York Times v. United States (1971), New York Times co-counsel Floyd Abrams and attorney Ted Olson talked about President Nixon's reaction to the ...

President Gerald Ford’s pardon of former President Richard Nixon 50 years ago is seen as a damaging precedent establishing presidential impunity. Now, the Supreme Court has affirmed that impunity.

President Nixon’s argument before the Court claimed that the President has an absolute right to assert a blanket claim of executive privilege against criminal subpoenas.

Meanwhile, Mr Smith is using the 1974 Supreme Court case United States v Nixon to argue that he should not be.

In Trump v. United States, the Court failed to do this and also failed to live up to America’s highest ideals: nonpartisan justice and the rule of law.

The special counsel and Trump’s lawyers have cited Supreme Court rulings on Nixon and presidential immunity — but two different cases with very different outcomes.

On Monday, the Supreme Court issued a highly anticipated ruling in Trump v. United States. The court split 6-3 on partisan and ideological grounds. Federal prosecutors allege that former President ...

Cannon deemed the language at issue from the Nixon case to be that sort of statement that isn’t binding precedent. Here’s the relevant passage from United States v.

The U.S. Supreme Court in Nixon v. United States recognized Jaworski’s appointment pursuant to federal statutes without raising an eyebrow, affirming his standing to subpoena Nixon for tapes ...

Meanwhile, Mr Smith is using the 1974 Supreme Court case United States v Nixon to argue that he should not be. The facts and rulings in each case involvingthe late scandal-plagued president offer ...