For proof, look at the sites that get the green light from Wikipedia. The New York Times, a chief organ of actual disinformation on everything from Joe Biden’s glaring senility to COVID risks.

crowd-sourced contributions with minimal oversight – poses substantial risks to individuals, institutions, and public discourse. The report, titled “Wikipedia: Immense but Uncontrollable Power ...

The non-profit Wikimedia Foundation is challenging the United Kingdom’s online safety rules in court over concerns they may ...

safeguards the public from disinformation, and ensures its editors are not influenced by funders and sponsors. “It has come to my attention that the Wikimedia Foundation, through its wholly owned ...

Mis- and disinformation have once again been named the top global risk of the immediate term in the annual World Economic Forum (WEF) Global Risks Report 2025. This comes just days after Meta ...

At last year’s World Economic Forum, a survey found that the leaders from around the world consider misinformation and disinformation from AI as the top global risk we face in the short term ...

Staying on the right side of the European Union’s online rulebook when it comes to the slippery topic of disinformation is ... to mitigate such systemic risks. But one question is what kind ...

Advances in AI have supercharged these risks. The G20's Financial Stability Board warned in November that generative AI "could enable malicious actors to generate and spread disinformation that ...

Outfits like the Daily Caller, the Federalist, the Washington Free Beacon, Fox News and even The Post have been labeled untrue by Wikipedia. Tada Images - stock.adobe.com For Wikipedia ...

Wikimedia says that even content forwarding Wikipedia features, like allowing users to choose the daily “Picture of the day,” places it at risk of ... content or disinformation they publish.