The Supreme Court said Friday it will review the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act’s no-cost coverage mandates for certain preventive care services, putting the landmark health care law in front of the justices again just as President-elect Donald Trump – who tried to repeal the law during his first presidency – returns to the White House.

A new case before the Supreme Court targeting preventive coverage mandates under Obamacare gives President-elect Donald Trump a chance to undermine one of the most controversial aspects of the healthcare program that he promised to “repeal and replace” nearly a decade ago.

The U.S. Supreme Court's current term includes cases involving TikTok, guns, gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors, online pornography, religious rights, preventive healthcare, Planned Parenthood funding,

The Supreme Court will hear arguments in Braidwood v. Becerra, a case that may curtail access to no-cost preventive care.

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a lawsuit that will determine whether preventive services will remain fully covered by group health plans under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). | The Supreme Court will decide the fate of the preventive services provision,

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Friday to decide the legality of a key component of the Affordable Care Act that effectively gives a task force established under the landmark healthcare law known as Obamacare the ability to require that insurers cover preventive medical care services at no cost to patients.

The Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether some preventive care coverage requirements under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) should be

The Supreme Court agreed Friday to consider reinstating ... full insurance coverage for things like medication to prevent HIV and some cancer screenings. The lower-court ruling chipped away ...

The Supreme Court said Friday it will review the constitutionality ... to cost-free preventive treatments and services, including HIV prevention medications, heart statins and various screenings ...

Parents in Maryland said a school board’s refusal to notify them and to excuse their children from discussions of the storybooks violated the First Amendment.

The Supreme Court said Friday it would review a case involving a group of Maryland parents who sued their children’s school district over its refusal to allow them to opt out of elementary school

The outgoing president’s move is mostly symbolic, but he has given the push for the 28th Amendment some new momentum.