Tulsi Gabbard, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for director of national intelligence, brought in over $1.2 million last year as a MAGA surrogate, according to a financial disclosure released Saturday.
The president is surrounding himself with people who may be television-ready but are not prepared to lead the country.
Tulsi Gabbard, President Donald Trump's pick to be director of national intelligence, has faced tough questions from lawmakers during a fiery confirmation hearing Thursday.
Tulsi Gabbard, whom he selected to be Director of ... Julia Johnson is a politics writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business, leading coverage of the U.S. Senate. She was previously a politics ...
That includes nearly $200,000 from her role as a Fox News contributor and nearly $120,000 ... Kennedy Jr. On top of her writing, media, and speaking work, Gabbard raked in $373,000 from her company Tulsi Media LLC, the holding company for her podcast ...
Now a MAGA celebrity, Gabbard raked in more than $1.2 million last year. That includes a $297,000 book advance, $170,130 in speaking fees, and $199,500 from Fox News. When Tulsi Gabbard departed ...
Unlike Hegseth, a former Fox ... Gabbard’s specific policies might cause significant heartburn for old-school Republican hawks like McConnell, Collins, Murkowski and others. open image in ...
Gabbard started again as Bennet insisted, “Yes or no? Is Edward Snowden a traitor to the United States of America?” The post ‘Disqualifying’: Fox Contributor Hammers Tulsi Gabbard After Refusing Four Times to Call Snowden a Traitor first appeared on Mediaite.
Former New Jersey senator sentenced to 11 years for accepting bribes including gold bars and cash, and acting as a foreign agent for Egypt.
A crash between a passenger jet and a military helicopter could be America's worst aviation disaster in nearly 25 years, and Australia's terror threat level will remain stable despite recent antisemitism.
Gabbard was questioned by Republicans and Democrats alike on her views of Snowden and whether she believes he was a traitor. She declined to say she believed he was a traitor, repeating that she felt he had broken the law and reiterating a point that she has made in the past, that he exposed practices that have resulted in the reform of 702.