Three South African environmental and climate justice organisations took the South African government to court in November 2021, to challenge the authorisation of new coal-fired power as part of the ...

Sars has the legal authority to impose travel restrictions on non-compliant taxpayers, as confirmed by a recent High Court ...

The Magistrate’s Commission will interview more than 290 candidates from May 5 for posts at these courts ... the Constitution mandates that judicial officers must reflect South Africa’s ...

A helicopter has crashed during an operation to extinguish a fire in southeastern South Korea on Sunday, killing its pilot South Korea's Constitutional Court ... were seen outside his home in ...

In her address at the 19th annual Human Rights Lecture at Stellenbosch University, renowned legal scholar Professor Cathi ...

The alleged mastermind, Shireen Matthews, made her first appearance at the court on Monday. The 35-year-old woman was arrested on Sunday by members of the South ... the media outside court that ...

33 Summary of findings In essence, South Africa’s domestic courts have interpreted its foreign policy to mean that: - foreign relations considerations are subordinate to the application of the ...

On Friday, 29 July 2011 the Constitutional Court handed down a judgment in three urgent applications for direct access about the purported extension of the term of office of the Chief Justice for 5 ...

South Korea's constitutional court has upheld the impeachment of President Yoon Suk Yeol.

Investors have flocked to South Africa's domestic bond markets, betting the country can stay the course on reforms despite ...

South Korea’s impeached former president, Yoon Suk Yeol, has denied charges of insurrection as his criminal trial opened. The ousted leader argued in the Seoul Central District Court on Monday ...

Courts are not supposed to make policy, just interpret government actions and determine when it violates the Constitution or existing law. The U.S. Supreme Court declared this authority in Marbury v.