Does using AI make you less of an artist? The US Copyright Office has weighed in on the debate. Its ruling could reshape copyright law as we know it.

The headline conclusion in the Copyright Office's report is that output generated simply by using a text prompt in an AI ...

The controversy surrounding AI and copyright extends beyond the courtroom to the art market, where AI-generated works are ...

It stated that the use of AI as an assistive tool or the incorporation of AI generated works could not be grounds to preclude a work of art from copyright. However, the capabilities of advanced ...

How artificial intelligence is pushing the boundaries of art... and copyright Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly prevalent in the art world, sparking fascination as much as concern. The ...

The US Copyright Office issued its latest findings on the controversial question of who owns artworks created using generative tools. A visitor takes a picture of an ...

Art generated by artificial intelligence (A.I.) from a text prompt cannot be copyrighted even if an artist uses long, targeted inputs or creates multiple iterations of a work before they are ...

The report acknowledges that, in theory, we could see the development of AI systems that do give artists more control. That ...

Artwork generated by artificial intelligence must have a human contributor to earn copyright protection in the United States, the U.S. Copyright Office has determined.

Human-created works with AI elements, however, can still be copyrighted as a whole. Generative artificial intelligence output ...