Dozens of problematic papers remain in the literature, after a publication hit by fraudsters pledged to tackle the issue.
NIH-funded research is full of corruption and waste and produces faulty, unreproducible results. Sweeping reforms are needed.
Lately, there have been many headlines about scientific fraud and journal article retractions. If this trend continues, it represents a serious threat to public trust in science.
Peter Marks, the FDA's top vaccine official ousted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said the U.S. health secretary's team sought ...
Open science’ is a radical shift from traditional research practices. But it can help research integrity in several ways.
Scientists should experiment with creative ways of communicating their work to inspire action to protect the natural world, ...
Dr. Peter Marks says the new health secretary’s team wants to show vaccines aren’t safe while promoting dangerous and ...
I wrote about Trump’s crackdown on the pillars of civil society— the universities, the scientific community, the media, the legal profession, and the arts — with the clear intent of intimidating them ...
A paper proposing NIH reforms is circulating in academic circles and within the agency as scientists search for hints of its ...
Towards the end of the episode, Huberman dove into exercise-- he said that high-intensity interval training (HIIT), sprint ...
Department of Marketing Assistant Professor Anne Hamby has been published in the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, ...
The all-area high school boys hoops team features two Mr. Basketball finalists, leaders on state-winning programs and more ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results